Molokai Action Team: Searching for economic solutions
By Kate Gardiner
4/16/2008 1:30:16 AM
Molokai News : Politics
  View Comments Post Comment

Gathered around a table in Kulana ‘Oiwi, Molokai's political and economic leaders talked story about the closure of Molokai Ranch. The group of 14 men and women (two absent) were brought together by Gov. Linda Lingle to address the island's socioeconomic future. Representatives from all levels of government joined business leaders and homesteaders to figure out what the strategy should be for the future of Molokai.

Colette Machado, Molokai's Office of Hawaiian Affairs representative, began the meeting with her opinion. "Given the tumultuous situation, and as the only one who worked on the plan, one of the architects, there are greater issues we need to talk about ... I want to make those points very clear," she said.

Machado was referring to the Master Land Use Plan for Molokai Ranch, completed in 2006. The plan is cited by some as the cause of a divide in the community. The Ranch closed April 5, surprising some island residents and costing 120 people their jobs. The Molokai Action Team convened for the first time April 7 to figure out just where the island was going to discover its new economic base, and what should be done for the community in the short and long-term.

The group concluded its session with more questions than answers, and a valuable exchange of ideas.
Machado continued, "[It] has not been a good process, and [I come to the team] with anguish and hostility ... I am very direct, and I accepted this role to provide the long-term approaches. [I value] honesty, transparency and working together."

Other members of the group shared their opinions at the beginning of the meeting, citing past meetings and their own experience working on other coalitions.

Barbara Haliniak, president of the Molokai Chamber of Commerce and a member of various Maui County business and economics-based boards, said that part of MAT's goal should be to address, "how we can help not only the laid off, but also what we can do to help stabilize the economy."

Abbey Mayer, the newly appointed director of the state Office of Planning, who chairs the new committee, said that the governor is willing to support any action that the committee chooses to take. "The function of this committee is not something that will dictate to Molokai what should happen. What happens has to be bottom up. We have to have some evidence of consensus [to achieve anything.]"

Sen. J. Kalani English and Rep. Mele Carroll, Molokai's representatives in the state legislature, reminded the room that they're on a legislative time crunch. "The legislature is in its final month," said English. "If there's anything [for us to do] it has to be thought up really quickly. We have to find a vehicle to put it in. We don't have a lot of time to look at the short-term things ... and the long-term things [can be saved for next session]."

Molokai's Maui County councilmember Danny Mateo suggested that the state bring the Department of Agriculture to Molokai, if that's the way the community decides to go. "If you brought the DOA to Molokai," he said. "There could be recognition of potential on Molokai, if Ag is this community's choice ... I don't think shipping our people to Maui is the solution. There are social implications with that as well."

Kammy Purdy, general manager of the Molokai Livestock Cooperative and president of the Ahupua'a association of Molokai homesteads, said some 30 homesteaders lost their jobs with the Molokai Ranch closure. "Most homesteaders had 40 acres fenced," said Purdy. "[We should] think about getting cattle into those 40 acres, either for self-sufficiency or stock the Molokai Livestock Coop so that there's fresh and healthy meat for the island of Molokai. It's an economical course to take."

JoAnn Ridell, executive assistant to Maui County Mayor Charmaine Tavares, said that any such livestock program should be developed with the consultation of the Maui Cattle company, a group of small owners who operate a slaughter facility on that island. "They've become very successful," she reflected. "We should find out how and utilize them."

Purdy added, "It shouldn't only be cattle. Pigs for a piggery ... some people have goats, someone has an exotic meat permit, sells venison ... We need to find out how many families want what."

Outside of livestock, Purdy suggested some sort of scholarship for Ranch employees who want to go back to school. "Molokai has a need for everything," she said. "Those who want to get an education to get out of minimum wage jobs ... should be able to get that education. I would push for some kind of scholarship for going back to college."

Mayer said that he feels that there "has to be some driver that brings money for the outside to Molokai. As far as Ag is concerned ... the issue is water ... and the lack of water meters for non-homesteaders." Mayer suggested that the group might need to investigate the future availability of water through the Molokai Irrigation System. "If the community asks us to get involved in that issue ... [this body could play a role in what happens.]"

Machado said that she thinks the Ranch closure might provide some entrepreneurial opportunities. "The theater, the gas station might be more immediate. It might be a simple arrangement with MPL [Molokai Ranch's company] and the lease for the cinema, the gas station ... somehow those businesses might be able to get started."

Walter Ritte, a community activist who was attending the meeting as a layperson and not a member of the Team, said he "represents the group that's adamantly against La'au." He said that his group "made the assumption that La'au is off the table. If the governor can clarify that position, and if this issue is gone, then we have decided to go into an offensive mode and figure out the things we want for economic development on Molokai ... the feeling I get is that it's time for us to work together ... We want to have a new land owner on Molokai. Them closing the Ranch is a new opportunity."

Ritte said that he has been trying to get partners, including OHA, to gel the community together. "The crack in the door is not going to last for long," he said. "[We need to] take care the workers and to care for Molokai Ranch. We're a group that wants to put our energy into those goals. [We want to pick] up Molokai and pick up ourselves."

Mayer asked the group, "Is MPL willing to sell? There's questions that frankly haven't been answered. They say they're not gonna sell, they're going to land bank. But they're also businessmen, and if the price is right ... key pieces of the puzzle need to be filled in."

Sen. English said that he was curious about the Ranch contract with the Molokai Irrigation System. "The Ranch has been in discussions with the PUC as far as their pricing of water and their continuing operations of the water system ... There are big issues going on, [including] what the Ranch's responsibilities are as regarding the Public Utilities Commission. Substantatively, we know that someone will get water to the West End ... at the same time, without the $136,000 the Ranch contributes every year, the MIS is in the red."
Purdy responded, "The Ranch came to the Department of Hawaiian Homelands to get them to buy Well 17 and the Homesteaders said no. There is no contract ... they're doing it on a day-to-day basis. There's people on the other end of that line and there's no way to stop that happening."

In the short-term, said Mayer, the group should focus on "getting assistance to the workers and affected communities." In the long term, he said, "I don't see it as our role to dictate to the island. We have to facilitate research and resource ideas, and how to implement them and get things off the ground. A lot has to get off the ground."

Barbara Kalipi, from the Queen Liliuokalani Children's Center, wondered what the purpose of the MAT was. "We won't have a good process if we don't have some clarity on how to weigh-in on proposals ... What is our kuleana?"

Rep. Carroll said she's been asked to work with the legislature and the county, "[People have been asking me] if I lose my house, is there an emergency fund? Would the governor commit to an emergency fund?" She continued, "Lots of requests are coming, and we're looking at program cuts. We don't want people to lose their homes ... [Can we commit] to subsidies for transportation?" Carroll said that people were even asking for flight subsidies to avoid "the traumatic experience of riding the ferry every day." She concluded, "Although we need to look at the long term, I'm getting ‘what are we going to do tomorrow?'"

In the short-term, suggested Sen. English, the governor might fund the bill for an emergency environmental workforce. "We could hire immediately if it were funded," he said. "If we want to do that, then ... we use it for cleanup, eradication [of invasive species]. It's a good venue."

Ray Foster, general manager for Monsanto Molokai, said that he will be adding another 20 positions for seasonal employees. "Molokai has the land, the labor and the water that would facilitate expansion. It's not on the books now, but it's not out of the question."

Ritte brought up his final point, subsistence use of Molokai Ranch lands. "If DLNR comes in to help manage, and employees are organized to utilize the resources, then it'd work. The employees [already] have a volunteer system about who goes where when. They just need a lead agency to make sure that it's implemented to the satisfaction of the Ranch."

Mayer took all of the committee's recommendations and suggestions back to the governor's office, and promised to attempt to answer the questions asked by team members. The next meeting of the Molokai Action Team will be May 5, 11 a.m. at Kulana ‘Oiwi's DHHL Conference room. The public is welcome to attend.

The Molokai Action Team consists of Mayer, chairman; deputy director for the state department of human services, Henry Oliva; English; Carroll; Machado; Mateo; Ridall; Purdy; Janice Kalanihuia, executive director, Molokai General Hospital; Foster; Kalipi; Haliniak; Stacy Crivello, president, Ke ‘Apuni Lokahi/Molokai Enterprise Community; and Jimmy Duvauchelle, paniolo president of the Maunaloa Ohana and former Molokai Ranch employee.




Comments


Go Colette Machado and Molokai Action Team! I stand beside you in the effort to make right what was done wrong. We're counting on you and have complete confidence that you'll help restore economic success to Molokai. Just ignore the ridicule and path of intimidation that others may push upon you and you will prevail. The successful future of Molokai is counting on it!

4/18/2008, 11:50:49 PM
Good Job Collette. Develop all of west Molokai. That will give us all jobs for many many years. Who cares if we turn into Maui. I really am looking forward to Kaluakoi's new Outback Steakhouse and the Kaunakakai Walmart. Always droping prices

4/22/2008, 7:18:03 PM
Hello Molokai Action Team,
I would like to offer a few ideas that will hopefully contribute to Molokai’s economical success in the short and long term. For your consideration, please review the following suggestions:

1. It is apparent that Molokai does not have a water shortage problem, but a water management problem. When I stand on the hills of Kawela and see the contrasting band of reddish brown and gray water along the shoreline against the deep blue sea beyond, It is obvious that Molokai’s south shore reef is on the verge of collapse and suffocation due to millions if not billions of gallons of water run-off as a result of soil erosion and the lack of an irrigation system to control the flow of water as it streams down the mountainside. These water issues could be totally eliminated by building an infrastructure of v-ditches along the mountainside and creating catch basins and water retention reservoirs to contain and divert the water. Building concrete v-ditches is not only unobtrusive, but they are relatively cheap to build. The creation of v-ditches and retention ponds however will require a significant work force, and as a result, provide many jobs for the community. Water is critical for a self sustainable island and without question the most vital element for life. Protecting the reef is paramount to Hawaiian culture and for sustenance practices as well as for the survival of the island itself. It would be sad day if Molokai became a dried out island with a dead reef and be nothing but a windmill based power source for Oahu. Providing plenty of water and maintaining a thriving reef ecosystem will bring prosperity and renewable life to Molokai. Managing the water and protecting the environment is by far the most effective and natural solution to help Molokai heal itself. Solving this problem is the most responsible and caring thing to do for Molokai and the people that help make this happen should be respected and dignified for perpetuity.

2. Regardless of what the activists think or threat about, MPL’s Master Plan was a good one. When we look at the other alternatives and the conflict this has caused the community today, The Plan brought to the table a sensible and balanced approach to development, conservation of lands, and the promise of economic vitality to Molokai. Never before in the history of development in Hawaii, have I seen a company work so closely with the community to get approval to build on “their land” and create a plan that benefited and respected the majority of the communities concerns and desires. The invalid argument that Lau’au Point will bring millionaires to the island and will change the socio-economic balance on Molokai is false. Papohaku Ranchlands for example, already has millionaires with million dollar lots and million dollar homes and that has not changed Molokai socially as the activist warn. A family that decides to buy a lot at La’au Point qualifies them to pretty much purchase a lot anywhere in the world they want. So if they decide to purchase on Molokai, it s because they love Molokai for the same reasons we all love Molokai and they will want to keep it that way. There is nothing wrong with having a wealthy family that loves Molokai since they will want to protect and preserve it just as much as everyone else and they will also provide financial support. Bringing the Master Plan and MPL out of mothballs will bring back the Lodge, Theater, and other facilities that were shutdown. Bringing back MPL could also bring back the 120 jobs that were required to keep the company running. Approving The Plan would restore the Kaluakoi Hotel to its previous grandeur and in addition to the restoration of 120 jobs; it will add 100+ more jobs on Molokai. The Plan will also revive the economy, since the development will require workers in the building and construction industry which include carpenters, electricians, plumbers, designers and more. MPL has also pledged to donate $10 million of the Lau’au Point proceeds back to the community. The La’au Point development can also have a positive ripple effect throughout the island since it will impact all current businesses in Molokai from plant nurseries to food markets. The Plan also prevents over-development with the donation of 26,000+ acres of pristine land to a community land trust for preservation. You cannot compare The Plan to other developments in our State, since no other developments in the history of Hawaii, had ever offered to return more than 16 times the amount of land than what they are plan to build on. In comparison, Imagine Waikiki with only one building and the remaining beach conserved as a land trust. The Plan is a better proposal than what Windmills have to offer and better for Molokai’s future. This time around, rather than allow a handful of vocal activists try to deter, yell at, and threaten the community, Let’s have an Island Wide Vote to bring back “The Plan” and see what the true majority thinks. The Plan will bring back the Peace and the Balance. Let’s welcome back MPL to the neighborhood with the true aloha spirit that our island is known for but almost lost. Former Activists, there is no shame in doing the right thing and supporting an economically successful Molokai and a future for our children.

3. Walter Ritte has received funds and grants from several federal and government sources totaling more than two million dollars for the sole purpose of restoring the ancient Hawaiian Fish ponds. These funds were paid by taxpayer dollars and may have not been fully expended yet? If not, jobs can instantly be created by the continuation of this effort. The fishponds have not been completely restored and no new jobs have been created as a result of this funding. The fish ponds play a significant role in Molokai and Hawaiian history. Restoring the fish ponds and using them to farm fish and other seafood is another notable, profitable and self-sustaining cause for Molokai. It not only promotes Hawaiian culture, but rebuilding it will also provide much needed jobs for a rightful cause. Fast tracking the various permitting process that may delay the reconstruction and perhaps hiring new leadership and management to create a plan and budget to completion will create more jobs. Due to land erosion and soil run off on the south and south east shores, it will be imperative to have proper water run-off control to prevent contamination of the fishponds as described in item #1 above.


4/22/2008, 8:07:12 PM
I was told that not one single Ranch Employee showed up to this meeting. Can someone please explain to me why this was the case. Isn't this a major concern, to find new sources for jobs? Were they not allowed?

4/22/2008, 9:41:59 PM
Hello????

The plan involves the ranch. You have a very selective memory. Do you not remember how the ranch just treated everyone. Remember the coconuts? They obviously do not care about anything but their development of La'au. They are holding the community hostage by putting a reseccion on the west end and scaring monsanto employees to manipulate support for La'au development. THE RANCH IS USING divide and conquer

4/23/2008, 1:01:54 AM

Knock, Knock...

We shouldn't base our opinions on conspiracy theories and assumptions. MPL just donated 1600 acres of pristine and significant land along the north shore between Mo'omomi and Illio Point. Is that an act of wickedness? We should look at economic solutions and a strong future for Molokai. Like it or not, The Plan had a good balance of conservation, development, cultural sensitivity, and the promise of new jobs. I don’t see any other proposal including windmills that even come close to what The Plan can offer for Molokai. So if you remove the negative thoughts of MPL as an uncaring evil empire and millionaires wanting to rape the land rather than protect it. It is actually a good positive plan. Rather than continue to go back and forth on MPL’s ulterior motives or how great The Plan is, we should put this to an Island Wide Vote and settle this once and for all. Majority wins. (period)

4/23/2008, 5:36:33 AM
Maybe you didn't see the 30-40 coconuts on the ground. Or hear that walter tried to get Sabas to allow his crew to cut down kiawe to save the trees. I guess that is a conspiracy theory too. It must be hard to walk far in your shoes being so blind.

4/23/2008, 10:02:18 AM

Shame on MPL for cutting down THEIR coconut trees on THEIR property. Just for that, we should tell them to take back their donation of 1600 acres of pristine land! That will show them! (NOT)

4/23/2008, 12:28:33 PM
Sorry unlike you I won't be bribed. No amount of gifts and reperations will make me forget how the MPL treats people who oppose their plans.

4/23/2008, 2:09:08 PM
The Molokai Team along with other dignitaries, who try to come up with sustainable solutions, needs to remember
the issues presented reflects not only for themselves or the people they support, but should also include the General Public with their representatives and invite them to these meetings, where they may express themselves with postive goals. At least they were given the chance to Free Speech.

4/24/2008, 7:38:48 AM
.




Sierra Club
contact the molokai times

molokaitimes.com content and design is copyrighted
and protected by federal law